تعیین زمان مناسب استفاده از قارچ‌کش‌ها برای کنترل بیماری لکه قهوه‌ای جو

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی-فارسی

نویسندگان

1 پژوهشگر مرکز تحقیقات و نوآوری سازمان اتکا

2 هلدینگ مزارع نوین ایرانیان

3 استادیار مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان گلستان

چکیده

بیماری لکه قهوه ­ای (Bipolaris sorokiniana)، یکی از بیماری­ های برگی مخربی است که در شرایط همه­ گیری خسارت قابل توجهی به جو وارد می­ کند. استفاده از قارچ­کش­ ها، روش سریع کنترل این بیماری در سال­ های همه‌گیری می ­باشد. بدین منظور آزمایشی در قالب طرح کرت­ های خرد شده در چهار تکرار طراحی گردید. عامل اصلی آزمایش را ارقام(صحرا و یوسف) و عامل فرعی را تیمارهای سمپاشی با قارچ­کش ­های رایج منطقه شامل تیلت، فولیکور، فالکن و رکس دو به ترتیب در چهار زمان T0 (مرحله اوایل ساقه­ روی تا تشکیل گره 1)،  T1(مرحله تشکیل گره 3-2)، T2 (ظهورکامل برگ پرچم) و T3 (گلدهی) تشکیل دادند. در تحقیق حاضر، ده تیمار سمپاشی بر اساس زمان مراحل رشدی جو در نظر گرفته شد که شامل تیمارهای Tr1: یک بار سمپاشی در مرحله اوایل ساقه­ روی تا تشکیل گره 1، Tr2: یک بار سمپاشی در مرحله تشکیل گره 3-2، Tr3: یک بار سمپاشی در مرحله ظهور کامل برگ پرچم، Tr4: یک بار سمپاشی در مرحله اوایل گلدهی، Tr5: دو بار سمپاشی در مرحله تشکیل گره 3-2 + ظهور کامل برگ پرچم، Tr6: دو بار سمپاشی در مرحله ظهور کامل برگ پرچم + اوایل گلدهی، Tr7: دو بار سمپاشی در مرحله اوایل ساقه‌روی تا تشکیل گره 1 + تشکیل گره 3-2،Tr8 : سه بار سمپاشی در مرحله تشکیل گره 3-2+ ظهور کامل برگ پرچم+ اوایل گلدهی، Tr9: چهار بار سمپاشی در مرحله اوایل ساقه­روی تا تشکیل گره 1+ تشکیل گره 3-2+ ظهور کامل برگ پرچم+ اوایل گلدهی وTr10  (تیمار شاهد) بودند. در این بررسی تیمارهایی با بیش از یک بار سمپاشی ازمرحله تشکیل گره 3-2 تا گلدهی (تیمارهای Tr5، Tr6، Tr8 و Tr9) توانستند سطح زیر منحنی پیشرفت وقوع بیماری (AUDPC-I) را در رقم صحرا بین 1/86-8/76 درصد و در رقم یوسف بین 2/81-3/68 درصد کاهش دهند، در حالی­که مقدار سطح زیر منحنی پیشرفت شدت بیماری (AUDPC-S) به ترتیب در ارقام صحرا و یوسف بین 7/65- 62 درصد و 7/62-1/60 درصد کاهش یافت. بیشترین درصد افزایش عملکرد نیز در تیمارهایی با بیش از یک بار سمپاشی از مرحله تشکیل گره 3-2 تا گلدهی وجود داشت که به ترتیب در رقم­ های صحرا و یوسف بیش از 37 درصد (8/1092 تا 1/1284 کیلوگرم در هکتار) و 41 درصد (8/1167 تا 1290 کیلوگرم در هکتار) افزایش عملکرد مشاهده شد. بر اساس نتایج بدست آمده، تیمار Tr5 (دو بار سمپاشی در T1+T2) مناسب­ ترین تیمار از نظر زمان استفاده قارچ­کش برای کاهش وقوع و شدت بیماری، افزایش عملکرد و سود اقتصادی بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Determination of optimum timing of fungicides application for the control of barley spot blotch

نویسندگان [English]

  • M. Abedi 1
  • K. Rezapour 2
  • M. A. Aghajani 3
  • F. Asadi 2
  • S. Salimian 2
1 Researcher at Etka Research and Innovation Center
2 Mazare Novin Iranian Holding
3 Assistant Professor, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Golestan Province
چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives
Spot blotch (Bipolaris sorokiniana)is one of the most destructive leaf diseases that causes significant damages to barley during epidemic periods. Fungicide application is a rapid control practice for this disease during epidemic periods. Several fungicides have been proposed for controlling of spot blotch, but these fungicides are effective if they reduce the disease pressure on important plant leaves, especially flag leaf. The results of fungicides application at different growth stages of barley are inconsistent, and also there is no comprehensive study on the timing of fungicides application for controlling of this disease in Iran. Therefore, the present study was designed to determine the appropriate timing of fungicides application at four growth stages of barley to decrease the disease pressure on the upper leaves of the plant, the timing of spraying on reduction of disease damage, and to increase yield and economic profit.
Materials and Methods
A field experiment was conducted in a split plot design with four replications. The main and sub-main factors of the experiment were cultivars (Sahra and Yousef) and the spraying treatments, respectively, and the common fungicides (such as Tilte, Folicur, Falcon, and Rexduo) were sprayed at four timings including, T0 (early stem elongation to node forming 1), T1 (node formation 2-3), T2 (the full flag leaf emergence) and T3 (flowering). The spraying treatments were selected as once, twice, three and four times spraying that were Tr1 (once spraying at early stem elongation to node forming 1), Tr2 (once spraying at node formation 2-3), Tr3 (once spraying at full flag leaf emergence), Tr4 (once spraying at flowering), Tr5 (twice spraying at node formation 2-3 + full flag leaf emergence), Tr6 (twice spraying at full flag leaf emergence+ flowering), Tr7 (twice spraying at early stem elongation to node forming 1+ node formation 2-3), Tr8 (three times spraying at node formation 2-3+ full flag leaf emergence+ flowering), Tr9 (four times spraying at early stem elongation to node forming 1+ node formation 2-3+ full flag leaf emergence+ flowering) and Tr10 (check). The efficiency of spraying treatments was evaluated one week after the last spraying by determining the index of disease (e.g., incidence and severity, area under the disease progress curve, AUDPC) as well as comparing the yield and yield components.
 
Results
The results of this study showed that treatments with more than once spraying from the node formation 2-3 to flowering stages (Tr5, Tr6, Tr8 and Tr9 treatments) could decrease the values of AUDPC-I between 76.8-86.1% and 68.3-81.2% in Sahra and Yousef cultivars, respectively. Whereas the values of AUDPC-S decreased between 62-65.7% and 60.1-62.7% in Sahra and Yousef cultivars, respectively. The highest percentage of yield increase was observed in the treatments with more than once spraying from the node formation 2-3 to flowering stages, which was more than 37% (1092.8 to 1284.1 kg/ ha) and 41% (1167.8 to 1290 Kg/ ha) in Sahra and Yousef cultivars, respectively.
Discussion
In both cultivars, the comparison of economic profit showed that Tr5 treatment (node formation 2-3 to flag leaf emergence stage) not only decreased the disease severity, but also increased the yield. It also reduced costs and had the highest economic profit compared to other spraying treatments (Tr6, Tr8 and Tr9). According to obtained results, the treatment of Tr5 (twice spraying at T1+T2 timing) was the best timing of fungicide application for the reduction of the disease pressure and the increase of yield and economic profit.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Spot blotch
  • Bipolaris sorokiniana
  • Spraying treatments
  • Growth stage
  • Barley
Abbasi, A. 2011. Chemical control of tan spot disease of wheat in Mazandaran province. M. Sc. Thesis, Azad University of Damghan, Damghan, Iran.
Aghajani, M.A. 2013. Guide to identifying and managing wheat diseases in Golestan province. Norozi press. 124 pp.  (in Persian).
Aghajani, M.A., Bagherani, N., and Mottaki, A. 2010. Chemical control of tan spot in Golestan province. Proceedings of the 19th Iranian plant Protection Congress, Tehran, Iran. P. 20.
Aggarwal, P.K., Talukdar, K.K., and Mall, R.K. 2000. Potential yields of rice-wheat system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Consortium paper series 10. Rice-wheat consortium for the Indo-Gangetic Plains, New Delhi, India. P. 16.
Bhandari, D. 2017. Identification of best spray schedules for propiconazole fungicide against spot blotch disease in wheat. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research, 15(20):1287-1293.
Bhandari, D., and Tripathi, J. 2005. Intensity of Helminthosporium leaf blight of wheat in different methods of planting. Proceedings of the 26th National winter crops research workshop, Nepal Agricultural Research Council held at Khumaltar, Kathmandu, Nepal, pp. 181-187.
Ershad, j. 2009. Fungi of Iran. Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection. 531 pp. (in persian).
Fernandez, M. R., Lim, S., Dokken-Bouchard, F. L., Miller, S. G., and Northover, P. R. 2012. Leaf spotting diseases of common and durum wheat in Saskatchewan in 2011. Canadian Plant Disease Survey, 92: 98101.
Heger, M., Oerke, E. C., Dehne, H. W., and Hindorf, H. 2003. Evaluation of an action threshold-based IPM wheat model in Rheinland (Germany) in 1999/2001. OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 33: 397–401.
Lopez, J. A., Rojas K., and Swart, J. 2015. The economics of foliar fungicide applications in
winter wheat in Northeast Texas. Crop Protection, 67: 35–42.
MacLean, D. 2016. Evaluating fungicide timing for leaf spot diseases of wheat and fungicide resistance in Pyrenophora tritici-repentis.M. Sc. Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Canada.
Marroni, M V., Viljanen-Rollinson, S.L.H., Butler, R.C., and Deng, Y. 2006. Fungicide timing for the control of Septoria tritici blotch of wheat. New Zealand Plant Protection, 59:160-165.
Orr, D. D., Turkington, T. K., and Kutcher, R. 1999. Impact of tilt timing on disease management in Harrington barley. Pest Management Research Report (PMRR), Lacombe, Alberta and Melfort, Saskatchewan, PP. 322-324.
 
Poole, N. F., and Arnaudin, M. E. 2014. The role of fungicides for effective disease management in cereal crops. Canadian Journal of Plant Patholology, 36: 1-11.
Saari, E., and Prescott J. M., 1975. A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases. Plant Disease, 59: 377–380.
Soovali, P., and Koppel, M. 2008. Influence of fungicides and variety resistance of fungal flora of barley grain. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 95: 158–165.
Sharma-Poudyal, D., Duveiller, E., and Sharma, R. C. 2005. Effects of seed treatment and foliar fungicides on Helminthosporium leaf blight and on performance of wheat in warmer growing conditions. Journal of Phytopathology, 153(8): 401-408.
Sharma, R. C., and Duveiller, E. 2006. Spot blotch continues to cause substantial grain yield reductions under resource limited farming conditions. Journal of Phytopathology, 154: 482-488.
Singh, S., Singh, H., Sharma, A., Meeta, M., Singh, B., Joshi, N., Grover, P., AlYassin, A., and Kumar, S. 2014. Inheritance of spot blotch resistance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 94 (7): 1203–1209.
Turkington, T. K., O’Donovan, J. T., Harker, K. N., Xi, K., Blackshaw, R. E., Johnson, E. N., Peng, G., Kutcher, H. R., May, W. E., Lafond, G. P., Mohr, R. M., Irvine, R. B., and Stevenson, C.  2015. The impact of fungicide and herbicide timing on foliar disease severity, and barley productivity and quality. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 95: 525-537.
Turkington, T. K., Kutcher, H. R., Clayton, G. W., O’Donovan, J. T., Johnston, A. M., Harker, K. N., Xi, K., and Stevenson, F. C. 2004. Impact of seedbed utilization and fungicide application on severity of net blotch (Pyrenophora teres) and production of barley. Canadian Journal of Plant Patholology, 26: 533-547.
Wegulo, S. N., Stevens, J., Zwingman, M. V., and Baenziger, P. S. 2012. Yield response to foliar fungicide application in winter wheat. In D. Dhanasekaran, N. Thajuddin, and A. Paneerselvam (Eds). Fungicides for Plant and Animal Diseases. InTech Open publisher, Rijeka, Croatia, PP: 227-244.
Weisz, R., Cowger, C., Ambrose, G., and Gardner, A. 2011. Multiple mid-atlantic field experiments show no economic benefit to fungicide application when fungal disease is absent in winter wheat. Phytopathology, 101: 323-333.
Zadoks, J.C., Chang, T.T., and Konzak, C.F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research, 14: 415-421.