مقایسه کارایی حشره‌کش‌های آلفاسایپرمترین، لامبدا سی هالوترین، تیاکلوپراید و مالاتیون روی کک‌های کلزا

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی-فارسی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار پژوهش، بخش تحقیقات حشره شناسی کشاورزی، موسسه تحقیقات گیاه‌پزشکی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار پژوهش، بخش تحقیقات گیاه‌پزشکی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی مازندران، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران

3 محقق بخش تحقیقات گیاه‌پزشکی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گلستان، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گرگان، ایران

چکیده

کک­ های کلزا از آفات مهم کلزا می ­باشند که با تغذیه از کوتیلدون ­ها و برگ­ های اولیه سبب خسارت می ­شوند. به‌منظور بررسی کارایی حشره ­کش ­ها برای کنترل کک ­ها، آزمایشی در قالب طرح بلوک­ های کامل تصادفی با شش تیمار و چهار تکرار در استان­ های مازندران و گلستان در سال 1397 اجرا شد. تیمارها شامل حشره­ کش‌های آلفاسایپرمترین (با دو غلظت 300 و 150 گرم در هکتار)، لامبدا­سی هالوترین، مالاتیون و تیاکلوپراید به ترتیب با غلظت­ های 75، 600 و 300 میلی ­لیتر در هکتار و شاهد بودند. درصد کارایی حشره ­کش­ ها در 3، 7 و 14 روز پس از سمپاشی و همچنین درصد بوته­ های خسارت دیده در 14 روز بعد از سمپاشی محاسبه ­شد. میانگین درصد تأثیر حشره‌کش ­های مورد بررسی در استان ­های مازندران و گلستان نشان داد که آلفاسایپرمترین با غلظت 300 و 150 گرم در هکتار و لامبدا­سی هالوترین به ترتیب با کارایی 87/17، 66/19، 81/84، 76/66، 86/12  و 76/00 درصد، بیشترین کارایی را در کنترل کک کلزا داشت. حشره­ کش­ های مالاتیون در دو استان مازندران و گلستان به ترتیب با 59/24، 66/22 درصد و تیاکلوپراید 01/14 و 19 درصد، کارایی کمتری در کنترل و کاهش خسارت کک­ های کلزا داشتند. همچنین درصد بوته‌های آفت زده بین تیمارها در 14 روز بعد از محلول­ پاشی در سطح احتمال 1% اختلاف معنی داری داشت. بنابراین آلفاسایپرمترین با دو غلظت 150 و 300 گرم در هکتار و لامبداسی هالوترین با غلظت 75 میلی‌لیتر در هکتارمی توانند به عنوان حشره کش های موثر برای کنترل کک­ های کلزا مورد استفاده قرار گیرند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of the efficacy of insecticides, alphacypermethrin and lambda-cyhalothrin, against canola flea beetles

نویسندگان [English]

  • A. A. Keyhanian 1
  • H. Barari 2
  • M.T. Mobasheri 3
1 Associate Research Professor, Department of Agricultural Entomology Research, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Research Professor, Plant Protection Research Department, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Sari, Iran
3 Researcher in plant Protection Research Department, Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Gorgan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives
Flea beetles are the main pests of oilseed rape which the adult beetles cause damage via feeding on cotyledons and early leaves of crop. They gnaw small round holes into leaves, decreasing assimilation surface and slowing down plant's growth. Heavy damage at the early stage of cotyledons may destroy the plant. The critical period of damage on the crop is from germination and cotyledon stage until the appearance of 4–6 true leaves, later the damage is less harmful. Control of this pest mostly depends on using chemical pesticides via seed dressing and/or foliar application. This study aimed to estimate the effects of new chemical insecticides to control this pest in Iran.
Materials and Methods
To chemical control flea beetles, the project was carried out in a Randomized Complete Blocks Design with six treatments and three replications in the provinces of Mazandaran and Golestan in 2018. The treatments were alpha-cypermethrin 15% WDG, with two doses (300 g/ha and 150 g/ha), lambda-cyhalothrin CS10% (75 ml/ha), malathion EC 57% (600 ml/ha), thiacloprid OD24% (300 ml/ha) and control. Sampling and counting of the flea beetles were done 1 day before and 3, 7, and 14 days after treatment via counting the cached beetles on yellow sticky traps (one trap in the center of each plot) as well as the active beetles in a 0.5×0.5m quadrate in each plot center. Fourteen days after treatment, the percentage of infested plants and leaf surface damage were measured. The beetle's mortality was calculated by the Henderson-Tilton formula. Data were analyzed with SAS ver. 9 software, and the means were compared using Duncan. 
Results
All insecticides showed a significant difference at 1% probability level comparing with control. Alpha-cypermethrin with 300 and 150g/ha and lambda-cyhalothrin in Mazandaran and Golestan provinces with 87.17,84.19, 81.66; 76.66, 86.12, and 76 percentage efficacies had the highest effectiveness in control the pest, respectively. Malathion in Mazandaran and Golestan with 24.59% and 22.66% and thiaclopride 14.01% and 19%, respectively, were less effective in controlling and reducing flea beetles damage on the crop. Moreover, the percentage of infested plants was significantly different among insecticides 14 days after treatment at a probability level of 1%.
Discussion
Pest management of canola flea beetles faces ecological challenges and severe dependence on synthetic chemical pesticides. Insufficient soil moisture, late planting, unsuitable planting beds, and hot and sunny days with dry winds in the early growing stages of canola in autumn increase the damage and reduce the green area of the field in a short time. Due to the unsatisfactory effect of biological substances and plant compounds on canola flea beetles, chemical insecticides are one of the main options to reduce the population of this distractive pest in rapeseed fields. In various studies, in addition to chemical insecticides, biological compounds and botanical insecticides were tested to manage the control of pest. But in most cases, chemical insecticides were more effective. Therefore, determining the appropriate time for application and using effective insecticides are integral parts of the pest control strategy. This study's result showed that alpha-cypermethrin 15% WDG (150 and 300 g/ha) and lambda-cyhalothrin CS10% (75 ml/ha) could be used as new insecticides to control canola flea beetles.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • alpha-cypermethrin
  • Canola
  • Flea beetles
  • lambda-cyhalothrin
Alavi, J. 2003. Flea Beetles, the Main Pests of Oilseed Rape in Golestan. Proceedings of the 15thIranian Plant Protection Congress, Kermanshah, Iran. P. 105. (In Farsi with English abstract).
Alavi, J. 2006. Report of three flea beetles on oilseed rape (Canola) from Khorasan-e-shomali provice. Proceedings of the 17th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, Karaj, Iran. P. 80.  (In Farsi with English abstract).
Alford, D.V., Nilsson, C. and Ulber, B. 2003. Insect Pests of Oilseed Rape Crops. In: Alford, D.V. (ed.). Biocontrol of Oilseed Rape Pests. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, pp. 9-41.
Andersen, C.L., Hazzard, R., Van Driesche, R., and Magan, F.X. 2006. Alternative management tactics for control of Phyllotreta cruciferae and Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on Brassica rapa in Massachusetts. Journal of Economic Entomology, 99(3): 803-810.
Antwi, F.B., Olsaon, D.L., and Knodel, J.J. 2007. Comparative evaluation and economic potential of ecorational versus chemical insecticides for crucifer flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) management in Canola. Journal of Economic Entomology, 100(3): 710-716.
Barari, H. 2014. Accurate Time for Control of Major Insect Pests of Oilseed Rape. Research Achievements for field and Horticulture, 3(4): 243-254. (In Farsi with English abstract).
Barari, H., and Mafi, S.A. 2019. Control management of main oilseed rape pests. Extension Coordination Management, Mazandaran Agricultural Jihad Organization. 24 pp. (In Farsi with English summary).
Barari, H., and Serri, S. 2010. Investigation on leaf and stem-feeder beetles of oilseed rape in Mazandadran. Proceedings of the 19th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, Tehran, Iran. P.603. 
Barari, H. 2005. Ecology of the coleopteran stem-mining pests and their parasitoids in winter oilseed rape: implications for integrated pest management. Ph.D. Thesis. University of London, Imperial College. London, UK.
Barari, H. 2016. Investigating the efficacy of Cruiser and Gaucho insecticides as seed treatments of oilseed rape to control flea beetles. Plant Protection (Scientific Journal of Agriculture), 38(4): 1-11. (In Farsi with English abstract).
Colovic, M.B., Krstic, D.Z., Lazarevic-Pasti, T.D., Bondzic,A.M., and Vasic V.M. 2013. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: Pharmacology and toxicology. Current Neuropharmacology, 11: 315–335.
Ferguson, A.W., Klukowski, Z., Walczak, B., Clark, S.J., Mugglestone, M.A., Perry, J.N., and Williams, I.H. 2003. Spatial distribution of pest insects in oilseed rape: Implications for integrated pest management. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 95: 509-521.
Henderson, F., and Tilton, W. 1995. Tests with acaricides against the Brown wheat. Journal of Economic Entomology, 48: 157-160.
Hiiesaar, K., Metspalu, L. P., Lääniste, P., and K. Jõgar, K. 2003.  Specific composition of flea beetles (Phyllotreta spp), the dynamics of their number on the summer rape (Brassica napus L. var. oleifera subvar. annua) Mascot. Agronomy Research, 1(2): 123–130.
Jellis, G. 2003. Pest management in cereals and oilseed rape. HGCA, 24 pp.
Keyhanian, A.A., Taghizadeh, M., Taghaddosi, M.V., and Y.Khajehzadeh .2005. A faunistic study on insect pests and its natural enemies in canola fields at different regions of Iran. Pajouhesh –Va-Sazandegi, 68(3): 2-8 (In Farsi with English summary).
Knodel J.J. 2017. Flea beetles (Phyllotreta spp.) and their management. In: Reddy, G.V.P. (ed.). Integrated management of insect pests on canola and other brassica oilseed crops. (Reddy, G.V.P. ed). CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp. 1-12.
Lamb, R.J. 1989. Entomology of oil seed crops, Annual Review of Entomology, 34: 211-223.
Mason, J., Alford, A.M., and Kuhar T.P. 2020. Flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) populations, effects of feeding injury, and efficacy of insecticide treatments on eggplant and cabbage in southwest virginia. Journal of Economic Entomology, 113(2): 887-895.
Maurya, R.P. 1998. Entomological problems of oilseed crops and extension strategy. Venus publishing house, New Delhi.
McLeod, P., Diaz, J.D., and Johnson, D. T. 2002. Toxicity, persistence, and efficacy of spinosad, chlorfenapyr, and thiamethoxam on eggplant when applied against the eggplant flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 95(2): 331-335.
Millar, N.S., and Denholm, I. 2007. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: targets for commercially important insecticides. Invertebrate Neuroscience, 7(1): 53-66.
Soderlund, D.M. 2012. Molecular mechanisms of pyrethroid insecticide neurotoxicity: recent advances. Archives of Toxicology, 86(2): 165-181.
Weiss, M.J., Mcleod, P., Schatz, B.G., and Hanson, B.K. 1991. Potential for insecticidal management of flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on canola. Journal of Economic Entomology, 84(5): 1597-1603.