کاهش خسارت راب Agriolimax agrestis Linnaeus با استفاده از هیدروکسید مس در شرایط گلخانه

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی-فارسی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، بخش تحقیقات جانورشناسی کشاورزی، موسسه تحقیقات گیاه‌پزشکی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران

2 استادیار، بخش تحقیقات گیاه‌پزشکی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان مازندران، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران

چکیده

راب Agriolimax agrestis از آفات مهم گیاهان زینتی گلخانه‌ای در ایران و جهان بوده که سالانه خسارت نسبتاً زیادی روی آن‌ها در گلخانه‌ها وارد می‌نماید. در این تحقیق کارایی یک ترکیب معدنی حاوی ماده مؤثر هیدروکسید مس، توبالین® SC 5%، در کاهش خسارت راب A. agrestis ارزیابی شد. در آزمایشگاه، اثر توبالین® روی تغذیه راب به دو روش انتخابی و غیرانتخابی بررسی و درصد دورکنندگی آن محاسبه شد. در شرایط گلخانه، محلول‌پاشی غلظت‌ چهار در هزار توبالین® به همراه راب‌کش‌های شیمیایی متالدئید و معدنی فریکول® به صورت طعمه‌پاشی و تیمار شاهد (آب‌پاشی) روی گیاهان زینتی اسپاتیفیلوم Regel Spathiphyllum wallisii در گلخانه‌های استان‌های مازندران و البرز اجرا گردید. آزمایش در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی به صورت قطعات 10 مترمربعی با چهار تکرار 5/2 مترمربعی انجام شد. رابها به تعداد مساوی (40 عدد) در هر قطعه روی بوته‌های گل زینتی اسپاتیفیلوم رهاسازی ‌شدند. سپس خسارت وارده به گیاه ناشی از تغذیه راب‌ها در 7، 14 و 21 روز پس از زمان اعمال تیمارها تعیین شد. براساس نتایج، درآزمون‌های انتخابی و غیرانتخابی، تغذیه راب‌ها از برگ‌های تیمار نشده بیشتر از برگ‌های تیمار شده با توبالین® بود. در آزمایش دورکنندگی، میانگین کل تعداد راب‌های شمارش شده در تیمار گیاه + گلدان طی 21 روز به ترتیب 4/0 و 3/0 عدد در استان‌های مازندران و البرز بدست آمد که از سایر تیمارها کمتر بود. در روز بیست و یکم پس از تیمار با توبالین® خسارت وارده به گیاه در دو استان مازندران و البرز به ترتیب 2/27 و 25 درصد بوده که بدون اختلاف آماری معنی‌دار با تیمار طعمه متالدئید با میزان خسارت به ترتیب 7/15 و 15 درصد، گروه‌بندی شدند. با نظر به اینکه از روز‌های هفتم تا بیست و یکم آزمایش، میزان خسارت در تیمار توبالین® رو به افزایش است و این ترکیب فاقد کشندگی روی راب است تکرار محلول‌پاشی بعد از دو الی سه هفته، برای تداوم اثر ضدتغذیه و دورکنندگی آن ضروری به نظر می‌رسد. شایان ذکر است که در استفاده از توبالین® نیاز به مصرف طعمه مسموم نیست و این ترکیب می‌تواند به عنوان جایگزین سموم شـیمیایی در مدیریت تلفیقی راب روی گیاهان زینتی در گلخانه‌ها مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Reducing the Damage of the Slug, Agriolimax agrestis Linnaeus using Copper Hydroxide in Greenhouse Conditions

نویسندگان [English]

  • E. Ahmadi 1
  • M. Gholamzadeh Chitgar 2
1 Associate Professor, Agricultural Zoology Research Department, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection (IRIPP), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Plant Protection Research Department, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Sari, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives

Agriolimax agrestis is one of the important pests of greenhouse ornamental plants in Iran and the world, especially in the northern provinces which cause a relatively large amount of damage to them in greenhouses every year. Chemical molluscicide, metaldehyde, is considered one of the most important compounds widely used to control the slug. The compound may cause many concerns for human health and other organisms (aquatic, birds, livestock, etc.) by entering the environment. Therefore, replacing high-risk chemical molluscicides with environmentally friendly and safe compounds can reduce the side effects of pesticides and the occurrence of resistance in this pest to the molluscicides. This research evaluated the effectiveness of Tobalin® as mineral compound 5% SC containing copper hydroxide in reducing the damage of A. agrestis slug.

Materials and Methods

In the laboratory conditions, the effect of Tobalin® (4 ml/L) on slug feeding was investigated by choice and non-choice methods. For the study, the surface of the leaves was measured before the start of the experiment using Image J software (ij153-win-java8), and the eaten surface by slugs was calculated after seven days.
In the repellency test, treatments included: (1) untreated pot and plant, placed on a copper hydroxide-treated substrate (plastic cafeteria tray); (2) sides of pot sprayed with copper hydroxide but plant foliage and substrate not treated; (3) plant foliage and pot treated with copper hydroxide and placed on untreated substrate; (4) untreated plant and pot (water spray only) placed on untreated substrate (untreated control). 60 slugs, each of which was 0.7 to 1 g in mass, were released into the center of the screenhouse, and each pot containing a plant was examined for the presence of slugs. The cumulative number of slugs observed on each plant and pot during 21 d of observation was totaled. The total number of leaves damaged by the slugs was determined at this time. In greenhouse conditions, spraying of concentration of 4 ml/L of Tobalin® with the chemical molluscicide metaldehyde (2.5g/m2) and the mineral molluscicide Ferricol® (5g/m2) as bait and control treatment (water) on ornamental plants Spathiphyllum wallisii was carried out in the greenhouses of Mazandaran and Alborz provinces. The experiment was done in a completely randomized design in 10 square meter plots with four repetitions of 2.5 square meters. Slugs (0.7 to 1 g weight) were released in equal numbers (40 pieces) in each plot on S. wallisii bushes. Then, the damage caused to the plant by feeding slugs was determined on 7, 14, and 21 days after applying the treatments.

Results

According to the results, in choice and non-choice tests, slugs fed on untreated leaves (12.4 and 17.3 square centimeters, respectively) more than Tobalin® treated leaves (6.3 and 7.1 square centimeters, respectively). In the repellency test, the mean number of slugs counted in the plant + pot treatment during 21 days was 0.4 and 0.3, respectively, in Mazandaran and Alborz provinces, which was less than other treatments. Also, the percentage of damaged leaves in the pot plus plant treatment was 20.4% and 22.5% in Mazandaran and Alborz provinces, respectively, compared with control, 73% and 75.25%. In the greenhouse, on the 21st day after the treatment with Tobalin® (4 ml/L), the damage to the plant in Mazandaran and Alborz provinces was 27.2 and 25%, respectively, which were grouped without statistically significant difference with the treatment of bait metaldehyde with the amount of damage, 15.7 and 15% respectively. Considering that from the 7th to the 21st days of the experiment, the amount of damage in Tobalin® treatment is increasing and this compound is not lethal to slugs, repeating the foliar spraying after two to three weeks is necessary for the continuation of its anti-feeding and repelling effect.

Discussion

Mineral compound Tobalin® can be used to deter Agriolimax agrestis. It is worth mentioning that there is no need to use bait when using Tobalin® and this compound can be used as a substitute for chemical pesticides in the integrated management of slugs on ornamental plants in greenhouses.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • slug
  • repelling
  • anti-feeding
  • ornamental plant
Adeline, S. J., Chakravarthi, R., Khamis, N. H., Harum, M., & Yeow, Y. K. (2018). Sound Based Identification of snail pest in Agriculture. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(4.25), 267-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.25.26936
Barker, G.M. (2002). Molluscs as crop pests. CABI Publishing. 468.
Büchs, W., Heimback, U., & Czarnecki, E. (1989). Effects of snail baits on non-target carabid beetles. In: Henderson, I. (Ed.). Slugs and Snails in World Agriculture. British Crop Protection Council no. 41. The Lavenham Press Limited, Lavenham, Suffolk. pp. 245–252.
Capinera, John L. (2018). Assessment of Barrier Materials to Protect Plants from Florida Leatherleaf Slug (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Veronicellidae). Florida Entomologist, 101 (3), 373-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1653/024.101.0327
Capinera, J. Dickens, K. (2016). Some effects of copper-based fungicides on plant-feeding terrestrial molluscs: A role for repellents in mollusc management. Crop Protection, 83, 76-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.01.018
Cheng, E.Y. (1989). Control strategy for the introduced snail, Pomacea lineata, in rice paddy. In: Henderson, I. (Ed.). Slugs and Snails in World Agriculture. British Crop Protection Council no. 41. The Lavenham Press Limited, Lavenham, Suffolk. pp. 69–75.
Chopa, C. and Descamps, L. (2012). Composition and biological activity of essential oils against Metopolophium dirhodum (Hemiptera: Aphididae) cereal crop pest. Pest Management Science, 68(11), 1492-1500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3334
EPA. (2009). Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Coppers. Office of Pesticide Program factsheet, https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/reregistration/red_G-26_26-May-09.pdf.
Faberi A.J., Lopez, A.N., Manetti, P.L., Clemente, N.L., Castillo, H.A.A. (2006). Growth and reproduction of the slug Deroceras leave (Müller) (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora) under controlled conditions. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 4, 345-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2006044-211
Ghoniem, E. I., Abdelgalil, G. M., Gad, A. F., Eshra, E. H. (2022). Molluscicidal Activity and Biochemical Interactions of Copper Sulfate against Theba pisana (Müller). Punjab University Journal of Zoology, 37(2), 135-142. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pujz/2022.37.2.135.142
Godan, D. (1983). Pest slugs and snails: Biology and Control. Springer Verlag: Berlin, Germany, pp. 445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68797-6
Gomot, A., and Pihan, F. (1997). Comparison of the bioaccumulation capacities of copper and zinc in two snail subspecies (Helix). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 38, 85–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1997.1566
Hagin, R.D., Bobnick, S.J. (1991). Isolation and identification of a slug-specific molluscicide from quackgrass (Agropyron repens L. Beauv.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 39, 192-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00001a039
Hollingsworth, R.G. Armstrong, J.W. (2003). Effectiveness of products containing metaldehyde, copper or extracts of yucca or neem for control of Zonitoides arboreus (Say), a snail pest of orchid roots in Hawaii. International Journal of Pest Management, 49, 115-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0967087021000038135
Kelley, J.R., Martin, T.J. (1989). Twenty-one years experience with methiocarb bait. In: Henderson, I. (Ed.). Slugs and Snails in World Agriculture. British Crop Protection Council no. 41. The Lavenham Press Limited, Lavenham, Suffolk. p. 131–145.
Li, Z., Li, J., Guo, Z., Campos, L.C. (2020). Investigation of metaldehyde removal by powdered activated carbon from different water samples. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 6, 1432-1444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EW00962K 
Machałowski, T. and Jesionowski, T. (2021). Hemolymph of molluscan origin: from biochemistry to modern biomaterials science. Applied Physics A127, 3. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/s00339-020-04166-1
McDonnell, RJ., Paine, TD., Gormally, MJ. (2009). Slugs: A guide to the invasive and native fauna of California. University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication. 8336. DOI: https://doi. org/ 10.3733/ucanr.8336
Moran, S., Gotlib, Y., Yaakov, B. (2004). Management of land snails in cut green ornamentals by copper hydroxide formulations. Crop Protection, 23, 647–650. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cropro.2003.11.004
Ohlendorff, B. (1999). Slugs and snails. UC Pest Management Guidelines, Pest Notes. University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, UCANR Publications, 28.
Port, CM., Port, G. (1986). The biology and behavior of slugs in relation to crop damage and control. Agricultural Zoology Reviews, 1, 255- 299.
Purvis, G. (1996). The hazard posed by methiocarb slug pellets to carabid beetles: understanding population effects in the field. In: Henderson, I.F. Slug and snail pests in agriculture (Ed.). BCPC Monograph No. 66, British Crop Production Council, pp. 189-196.
Runham, N.W. (1989). Snail farming in the United Kingdom. p. 49–55. In: I. Henderson (Ed.). Slugs and Snails in World Agriculture. British Crop Protection Council no. 41. The Lavenham Press Limited, Lavenham, Suffolk.
SAS Institute. (2002). SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 9.0. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
Schüder, I., Port, G., Bennison, J. (2003). Barriers, repellents, and antifeedants for slug and snail control. Crop Protection, 22, 1033–1038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(03)00120-0
South, A. (1992). Terrestrial slugs. Biology, Ecology, Control. London: Chapman & hall Ltd.
South, A. (2012). Terrestrial Slugs: Biology, Ecology and Control. Netherlands: Springer.
Speiser, B. and M. Hochstrasser. (1998). Slug damage in relation to watering regime. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 70, 273–275.
 Stawarczyk, M. and Stawarczyk, K. (2015). Use of the imageJ program to assess the damage of plants by snails. Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology, (1-2), 67 – 73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cdem-2015-0007
Sullivan, J.T., Cheng, T.C. (1976). Comparative mortality studies on Biomphalaria glabrata (Mollusca: Pulmonata) exposed to copper internally and externally. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 28, 255–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2011(76)90131-2
Thompson, JM., Sebley, JL., Foshee, WG., Keever, GJ., Appel, AG. (2005). Effect of Copper hydroxide on slug feeding. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 23, 167-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-23.4.167
Wiktor, A. (2000). Agriolimacidae (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) – A systematic monograph. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 49, 347–590.
 © 2024 by the authors. Licensee SCU, Ahvaz, Iran. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0 license) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/