گیاه پزشکی

گیاه پزشکی

ارزیابی مقاومت لاین‌های امیدبخش گندم به بیماری لکه‌برگی سپتوریایی در شرایط اقلیمی شمال و جنوب ایران (گرگان و دزفول)

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی-فارسی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان آذربایجان‌شرقی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تبریز، ایران
2 استادیار بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اردبیل، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، مغان، ایران
3 محقق بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان لرستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، خرم‌آباد، ایران
چکیده
لکه ­برگی سپتوریایی گندم با عامل قارچی Zymoseptoria tritici یکی از بیماری­ های مهم این محصول در مناطق مرطوب و معتدل است که منجر به کاهش عملکرد و کیفیت دانه می ­شود. استفاده از ارقام مقاوم، مؤثرترین و پایدارترین روش مدیریت این بیماری به­ شمار می ­رود. در این پژوهش، واکنش فنوتیپی 113 لاین امیدبخش گندم شامل چهار مجموعه‌ ERWYT-N98، ERWYT-N99 (اقلیم شمال) و ERWYT-S98 و ERWYT-S99 (اقلیم جنوب) به­ همراه ارقام حساس تجن و داراب2 طی دو سال زراعی متوالی (1400-1398) در قالب طرح بلوک ­های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در شرایط مزرعه‌ای ایستگاه ­های تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گلستان (گرگان) و صفی‌آباد (دزفول) تحت مایه ­زنی مصنوعی ارزیابی شد. مقاومت گیاهان براساس دو شاخص پیشرفت نسبی بیماری و شدت آلودگی برگی اندازه ­گیری شد. نتایج نشان داد جدایه­ های گرگان و دزفول از نظر الگوی پرآزاری بر ژن­ های مقاومت تفاوت معنی­ دار داشتند. ژن­ های مقاومت Stb1، Stb5، Stb10، Stb12، Stb13، Stb14، Stb15، Stb16 و Stb18 در برابر جدایه‌های مورد بررسی مؤثر بودند، در حالی که ژن ­های مقاومت Stb7، Stb8 و Stb9 و تا حدی ژن­ های مقاومت Stb11 و Stb17 کارایی خود را از دست دادند. در میان لاین‌های امیدبخش، بخشی از ژنوتیپ‌ها واکنش نیمه‌مقاومت تا نیمه‌حساسیت نشان دادند، در حالی که بسیاری از لاین‌ها دارای واکنش حساسیت یا بسیار حساسیت بودند. شناسایی این منابع می‌تواند در برنامه‌های به‌نژادی و هرمی‌سازی ژن‌های مقاومت برای تولید ارقام پایدار و مقاوم به لکه‌برگی سپتوریایی مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Resistance of wheat elite lines to septoria leaf blotch under northern and southern climatic conditions of Iran (Gorgan and Dezful)

نویسندگان English

R. Roohparvar 1
A. Omrani 2
M. Dalvand 3
1 Assistant Professor, Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, East Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tabriz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Moghan, Iran
3 Researcher, Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Khorramabad, Iran
چکیده English

Background and Objectives
Septoria leaf blotch (STB), caused by Zymoseptoria tritici, is one of the most significant constraints to wheat production, particularly in humid and temperate regions, where temperatures between 22–25°C and relative humidity exceeding 85% favor disease development. The disease leads to substantial reductions in grain yield and quality. The high genetic variability of Z. tritici populations and their rapid evolution of novel virulence factors indicate the need to identify virulence determinants and discover sources of durable resistance. The virulence of Z. tritici isolates against wheat STB resistance genes (Stb1 to Stb18) could critically guide the breeding programs to develop resistant cultivars. Pyramiding multiple effective Stb resistance genes into elite wheat lines offers a sustainable strategy to reduce reliance on fungicides and develop climate-resilient STB-resistant cultivars.
Materials and Methods
To evaluate STB resistance in 113 Iranian elite wheat lines (designated ERWYT-N98, ERWYT-N99, ERWYT-S98, and ERWYT-S99, including 20, 23, 30, and 40 lines, respectively), field experiments were conducted in adult plant stage over two consecutive growing seasons of 2019–2021 under artificial inoculation conditions in a randomized complete block design with three replications at two agricultural research stations of Golestan (Gorgan) and Safiabad (Dezful). Wheat lines were inoculated with virulent local isolates of Z. tritici, followed by resistance evaluation based on two key parameters: relative vertical disease progress and percentage of disease severity on infected leaves. Host response to STB was scored using the 00–99 double-digit scale.
Results and Discussion
Zymoseptoria tritici isolates from Gorgan and Dezful showed different virulence patterns, both geographically and temporally, while Gorgan isolates displayed higher virulence on known Stb resistance genes than Dezful isolates in both years of the study. No virulence was identified among the resistance genes Stb1, Stb5, Stb10, Stb12, Stb13, Stb14, Stb15, Stb16, and Stb18 at either location or year of study, indicating their effectiveness against prevalent pathogen populations. In contrast, Stb7, Stb8, and Stb9, as well as Stb11 and Stb17, were ineffective against all or some of the tested isolates, suggesting their unsuitability for current breeding programs. Polymorphism regarding significant virulence variation was observed against Stb2, Stb3, Stb4, and Stb6, suggesting their possible contribution to durable resistance, especially in combination with other effective resistance genes, particularly in north agro-climatic zone. Phenotypic evaluation of elite wheat lines revealed variable levels of resistance across the four germplasm sets. Among ERWYT-N98 lines, 24%, 43% and 33% displayed moderately resistance (including lines ER-N98-14, 18, 19 and the cultivars Tirgan and Kalateh), susceptibility and high susceptibility responses, while in ERWYT-N99 set, 29%, 29% and 42% of lines were moderately resistant (ER-N99-6, 14, 16, 18, 21, 22, 23), susceptible and highly susceptible, respectively. Regarding the south agro-climatic zone lines of ERWYT-S98, 39% demonstrated moderately resistance (ER-S98-7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 23, 28, 29, and cultivars Chamran2 and Mehregan), while 29% and 32% were susceptible and highly susceptible, respectively. In ERWYT-S99 set, 24%, 22%, 30% and 24% of lines displayed moderately resistance (ER-S99-3, 18, 19, 22, 25, 28, 30, 31, 36, and Chamran2), moderately susceptibility (ER-S99-4, 7, 8, 10, 24, 32, 34, 35, and Mehregan), susceptibility and high susceptibility, respectively.
Conclusion
Utilization of genetic resistance is considered the most effective, economical, and environmentally sustainable strategy for managing septoria leaf blotch in wheat breeding programs. Host resistance could significantly reduce yield loss when integrated with other disease management methods, such as cultural practices and chemical control. Results of this study indicate that the resistance genes Stb1, Stb5, Stb10, Stb12, Stb13, Stb14, Stb15, Stb16, and Stb18 are effective against current Z. tritici populations in both Iranian north and south agro-climatic zones, and their incorporation (preferably as pyramiding) into high-yielding genetic backgrounds is strongly recommended. Additionally, identification of moderately resistant and resistant wheat lines in this study highlights their potential as sources of resistance and valuable breeding parents. Utilizing these lines could help reduce reliance on chemical control, minimize disease impact, and enhance wheat productivity, particularly in disease hotspots.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Breeding programs
geneic resistance response
susceptibility
wheat
Zymoseptoria tritici
Abrinbana, M., Mozafari, J., Shams-bakhsh, M., & Mehrabi, R. (2012). Resistance spectra of wheat genotypes and virulence patterns of Mycosphaerella graminicola isolates in Iran. Euphytica, 186, 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0493-z
Adhikari, T. B., Anderson, J. M., & Goodwin, S. B. (2003). Identification and molecular mapping of a gene in wheat conferring resistance to Mycosphaerella graminicola. Phytopathology, 93(9), 1158-1164. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.9.1158
Anonymous. (2023). Agricultural statistics: 2022-2023 Cropping cycle. 1st volume. Field crops. Information and Communication Technology Center. Deputy of Planning and Economy. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, 126 pp. (in Persian)
Arraiano, L. S., & Brown, J. K. (2017). Sources of resistance and susceptibility to Septoria tritici blotch of wheat. Molecular Plant Pathology, 18(2), 276-292. https://doi.org/10. 1111/mpp.12482
Ben M'Barek, S., Karisto, P., Abdedayem, W., Laribi, M., Fakhfakh, M., Kouki, H., & Yahyaoui, A. (2020). Improved control of Septoria tritici blotch in durum wheat using cultivar mixtures. Plant Pathology, 69(9), 1655-1665. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13247
Brown, J. K., Chartrain, L., Lasserre-Zuber, P., & Saintenac, C. (2015). Genetics of resistance to Zymoseptoria tritici and applications to wheat breeding. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 79, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2015.04.017
Chartrain, L., Brading, P. A., Makepeace, J. C., & Brown, J. K. M. (2004). Sources of resistance to Septoria tritici blotch and implications for wheat breeding. Plant Pathology, 53(4), 454-460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2004.01052.x
Dadrezaei, S. T., Minasian, V., Torabi, M., & Ayeneh, G. (2003). Effect of Septoria tritici infections at different growth stages on yield and yield components of three wheat cultivars. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal, 19, 101-116. https://doi.org/10.22092/SPIJ.2017.110943
Dalvand, M., Soleimani Pari, M. J., Zafari, D., Roohparvar, R., & Tabib Ghafari, S. M. (2016). Study on virulence factors of Mycosphaerella graminicola, the causal agent of Septoria tritici blotch and reactions of some Iranian wheat genotypes to this pathogen in Iran. Journal of Applied Biotechnology Reports, 3(1), 359-363.
Davari, M., Abrinbana, M., Zakaria, R. A., & Arzanlou, M. (2012). Assessment of wheat cultivars for resistance to Mycosphaerella graminicola isolates from Moghan Plain at seedling stage under greenhouse conditions. Iranian Journal of Plant Protection Science, 43(2), 379-389. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJPPS.2013.30257
Eyal, Z. (1999). Breeding for disease resistance to Septoria and Stagonospora disease of wheat. pp. 332-344. In: Lucas, J. A., Bowyer, P., and Anderson, H. M. (eds.) Septoria on Cereals: A Study of Pathosystems. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
Fallahi-Motlagh, S. F., Rohparvar, R., Kia, S., & Zamanizadeh, H. R. (2015). Evaluation of resistance of some wheat cultivars and lines to Septoria tritici blotch at seedling and adult plant stages. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal, 31(3), 73-90.
Giraldo, P., Benavente, E., Manzano-Agugliaro, F., & Gimenez, E. (2019). Worldwide research trends on wheat and barley: A bibliometric comparative analysis. Agronomy, 9(7): 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9070352
Hatami Rad, S., Ebrahimi, L., & Croll, D. (2023). Virulence associations and global context of AvrStb6 genetic diversity in Iranian populations of Zymoseptoria tritici. Phytopathology, 113(10): 1924-1933. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-09-22-0348-R
Hosseinnezhad, A., Khodarahmi, M., Rezaee, S., Mehrabi, R., & Roohparvar, R. (2014). Effectiveness determination of wheat genotypes and Stb resistance genes against Iranian Mycosphaerella graminicola isolates. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 47, 2051-2069. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2013.868696
Ghaneie, A., Mehrabi, R., Safaie, N., Abrinbana, M., Saidi, A., & Aghaee, M. (2012). Genetic variation for resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in Iranian tetraploid wheat landraces. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 132, 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-011-9862-7
Goudemand, E., Laurent, V., Duchalais, L., Tabib Ghaffary, S. M., Kema, G. H., Lonnet, P., Margalé, E., & Robert, O. (2013). Association mapping and meta-analysis: two complementary approaches for the detection of reliable Septoria tritici blotch quantitative resistance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Molecular Breeding, 32(3), 563-584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-013-9890-4
Kema, G. H. J. (2012). New broad-spectrum resistance to Septoria tritici blotch derived from synthetic hexaploid wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 124:125-142.
Kheirgoo, M., Panjeke, N., & Taliey, F. (2020a). Evaluation of resistance to Zymoseptoria tritici blotch and Fusarium Head Blight in some genotypes of bread wheat. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12(36), 151-159. https://doi.org/10.52547/jcb.12.36.151
Kheirgoo, M., Panjeke, N., & Taliey, F. (2020b). Identification of new sources of resistance to Zymoseptoria tritici blotch in genotypes of spring bread wheat. Journal of Applied Research in Plant Protection, 9(2), 31-43. (in Persian)
Kia, Sh., Rahnama, K., Soltanloo, H., Babaeizad, V., & Aghajani, M. A. (2018). Identification of resistance sources to Septoria tritici blotch with causal agent Zymoseptoria tritici in bread wheat genotypes. Agricultural Biotechnology Journal, 10(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.22103/JAB.2018.2067
Kia, Sh., & Torabi, M. (2008). Effects of infection with Septoria tritici blotch (Septoria tritici) at different growth stages on yield and yield components of wheat cultivars in Gorgan. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal, 24, 237-250.
Kramer, B., Thines, E., & Foster, A. J. (2009). MAP kinase signalling pathway components and targets conserved between the distantly related plant pathogenic fungi Mycosphaerella graminicola and Magnaporthe grisea. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 46(9), 667-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2009.06.001
Kristoffersen, R., Jørgensen, L. N., Eriksen, L. B., Nielsen, G. C., & Kiaer, L. P. (2020). Control of Septoria tritici blotch by winter wheat cultivar mix-tures: Meta-analysis of 19 years of cultivar trials. Field Crops Research, 249, 107696. https://doi.org/10.1101/658575
Mahboubi, M., Mehrabi, R., Naji, A. M., & Talebi, R. (2020). Whole-genome diversity, population structure and linkage disequilibrium analysis of globally diverse wheat genotypes using genotyping-by-sequencing DArTseq platform. 3 Biotech, 10(2), 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-2014-z
Makhdoomi, A., Mehrabi, R., Khodarahmi, M., & Abrinbana, M. (2015). Efficacy of wheat genotypes and Stb resistance genes against Iranian isolates of Zymoseptoria tritici. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 81, 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-014-0565-8
Mehrabi, R., A. Makhdoomi and M. Jafar‐Aghaie. (2015). Identification of New sources of resistance to Septoria tritici blotch caused by Zymoseptoria tritici. Journal of Phytopathology, 163(2), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12282
Mohammadbeygi, A., Roohparvar, R., & Torabi, M. (2014). Resistance sources to Septoria tritici blotch in selected wheat genotypes. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal, 30(3), 605-621. https://doi.org/10.22092/SPIJ.2017.111232
Omrani, A. & Dadrezaei, S. T. (2024). Investigation of Resistance Responses in Elite Wheat Lines and Cultivars to Brown Rust (Puccinia triticina Eriks.) in the Moghan Plain. Plant Protection (Scientific Journal of Agriculture), 47(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22055/ppr.2024.46519.1737
Omrani, A., Roohparvar, R., & Shahbazi, K. (2023). Reaction of wheat lines candidate for introduction as new commercial cultivars to Septoria tritici blotch. Applied Entomology and Phytopathology, 90(2), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.22094/jaep.2023.360133.1457
Ponomarenko, A., Goodwin, S. B., & Kema, G. H. (2011). Septoria tritici blotch of wheat. Plant Health Instr.
Roohparvar, R., Mehrabi, R., Nistelrooy, J. G. M., Zwiers, L. H., & Waard, M. A. (2008). The drug transporter MgMfs1 can modulate sensitivity of field strains of the fungal wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola to the strobilurin fungicide trifloxystrobin. Pest Management Science, 64, 685-693. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1569
Roohparvar, R., Omrani, A., Dehghan, M. A., & Dalvand, M. (2023). Virulence factors of Zymoseptoria tritici, the causal agent of wheat sptoria leaf blotch disease in disease hot spots during the years 2019-2021. Journal of Applied Research in Plant Protection, 12(3), 257–270.
Simon, M. R., Cordo, C. A., Castillo, N. S., Struik, P. C., & Börner, A. (2012). Population structure of Mycosphaerella graminicola and locatio of genes for resistance to the pathogen: recent advances in Argentina. International Journal of Agronomy, 2012, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/680275
Tabib Ghaffary, S. M., Robert, O., Laurent, V., Lonnet, P., Margalé, E., van der Lee, T. A., & Kema, G. H. (2011). Genetic analysis of resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in the French winter wheat cultivars Balance and Apache. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 123, 741-754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1623-7
Torriani, S. F., Melichar, J. P., Mills, C., Pain, N., Sierotzki, H., & Courbot, M. (2015). Zymoseptoria tritici: a major threat to wheat production, integrated approaches to control. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 79, 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2015.04.010
Torabi, M. (1979). Causal organism of wheat septoriose and its distribution in Iran. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology, 16, 7-16.
USDA. (2024). United States Department of Agriculture. Wheat: World Supply and Distribution. In World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) Report (June 2024). Economic Research Service. https://www.usda.gov/oce/commodity/wasde
Xu, S. S., Jin, Y., Klindworth, D. L., Wang, R. R., & Cai, X. (2009). Evaluation and characterization of seedling resistances to stem rust Ug99 races in wheat-alien species derivatives. Crop Science, 49(6), 2167. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.02.0074
Yang, N., McDonald, M. C., Solomon, P. S., & Milgate, A. W. (2018). Genetic mapping of Stb19, a new resistance gene to Zymoseptoria tritici in wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 131, 2765-2773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-018-3189-0
Yang, N., Ovenden, B., Baxter, B., McDonald, M. C., Solomon, P. S., & Milgate, A. (2022). Multi-stage resistance to Zymoseptoria tritici revealed by GWAS in an Australian bread wheat diversity panel. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13: 990915. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.990915
 © 2026 by the authors. Licensee SCU, Ahvaz, Iran. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0 license) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.